Type in your question below and we'll check to see what answers we can find...
Loading article...
Submitting...
If you couldn't find any answers in the previous step then we need to post your question in the community and wait for someone to respond. You'll be notified when that happens.
Simply add some detail to your question and refine the title if needed, choose the relevant category, then post.
Before we can post your question we need you to quickly make an account (or sign in if you already have one).
Don't worry - it's quick and painless! Just click below, and once you're logged in we'll bring you right back here and post your question. We'll remember what you've already typed in so you won't have to do it again.
Please see below the most popular frequently asked questions.
Loading article...
Loading faqs...
Please see below the current ongoing issues which are under investigation.
Loading issue...
Loading ongoing issues...
Hi,
i apprectiate that that maintaining the iPad version requires extra resources, but the recent update that had removed the iPad version and replaced it with the iPhone version is not acceptable.
The iPhone version is a massive downgrade and makes very ineffective use of screen real estate. Its laughably bad on my iPad Pro 13".
Your customers deserve better and whoever the bean counter is that you allowed to make this decision needs to realize that it's not acceptable for a premium product. It's sufficiently bad that I will be moving to an alternative platform, one which isn't driven purely by bottom line, but actually cares about customer experience. So long, I've been a paying subscriber and daily user for years and this is it for me.
Additionally describing this change in the patch notes as something about moving some buttons and a smiley face is hugely disingenuous. It's akin to the united ceo describing beating up a customer as re-allocation. Corporate BS at its finest.