Type in your question below and we'll check to see what answers we can find...
Loading article...
Submitting...
If you couldn't find any answers in the previous step then we need to post your question in the community and wait for someone to respond. You'll be notified when that happens.
Simply add some detail to your question and refine the title if needed, choose the relevant category, then post.
Before we can post your question we need you to quickly make an account (or sign in if you already have one).
Don't worry - it's quick and painless! Just click below, and once you're logged in we'll bring you right back here and post your question. We'll remember what you've already typed in so you won't have to do it again.
Please see below the most popular frequently asked questions.
Loading article...
Loading faqs...
Please see below the current ongoing issues which are under investigation.
Loading issue...
Loading ongoing issues...
Downloaded songs gone, playlists not marked for download:
I've read the Spotify Support response to this issue here:
https://support.spotify.com/us/using_spotify/troubleshooting/listen-offline-troubleshooting/
> Downloads unexpectedly removed
To put it simply, their response to this issue is pathetic.
I'm writing this after about the 6th time I've had to download all of the songs/playlists I had marked for download again (to be honest, I've lost count of how many times I've had to do it, but it has been at least 6-7 times). But what's even more annoying is that they switch the "download" toggle off for all of my downloaded playlists. So not only do I need to go through every single playlist I want to download and flip the toggle again, but I need to wait for them all to download again, and waste even more of time and my data plan to do so. Again.
This is a horrible quality of service for any music service - especially one that is as big as Spotify, and especially for how long they've been around now.
Inconveniencing users and placing the onus on them to resolve problems/inadequacies with your app/service is not good customer support. At a bare minimum, they could at least do the following:
There should never be a case where downloaded songs are removed or can no longer be used by the app. I have had other music I've purchased and downloaded on my phone or desktop/laptop for several years that has never needed to be removed or downloaded again. There's no reason that downloaded content from Spotify should either.
The only reasons I can think of for why they do this are laziness/carelessness, exploitation of user data, and control. If they weren't so lazy/careless, they would write better code for their app and back end to improve not only its functionality, but its horribly-limited feature set. If they weren't trying to exploit user data, they wouldn't need to require users to manually choose to go online every 30 days to stream music instead of only listening to downloaded songs. If they weren't so bent on controlling and restricting their users in order to maintain ownership of them and their data, they would have a more open architecture that was compatible with 3rd party apps with a far-better UI, and actual music database management and organization capabilities.
As soon as I have the time to find a better music service that is less restrictive and more user-friendly, it'll be the end of my Spotify usage. And I get the feeling I won't be the only one who jumps ship for similar reasons.
The days of Spotify are numbered. Alienating users the way they do isn't tolerated for long before people give up and move onto something better.
Plan: Premium
Country: Sweden
Devices: PC, MacBook Pro, Google Pixel 2
Operating Systems: Windows 10, macOS 10.12, Android 8.1
Spotify is a complete garbage service. I can't believe that the computer app is consistently less challenged yet chokes and chokes and chokes way more than the mobile app. You'd think they haven't furthered their coding for years now. Misspent money, I am waiting for an alternative. Joe Rogan won't be enough to hide such utter inferiority. The process to even leave a comment in their community explained the cluster fook that is their UX Developers don't know anything and should be replaced asap.
I couldn't agree more. Just got done talking to tech support after having to reload all my offline content for the fourth time in 10 days while on the road. They had no solutions. They're completely clueless. Offline content is lost everytime the phone does an update, the app updates, the phone goes to 0% battery or just randomly.
I'll be switching to Apple the first chance I get.
Hello everyone,
We appreciate you voicing your concerns here in our Community and we can assure you we understand it can be inconvenient and frustrating when one has to redownload a bigger amount of tracks for offline listening.
We see that the opinion is that there're no reasons for some of the app behavior, we'd however want to share some more details on the various reasons, both technical and other, for why some of the mentioned things can happen and why coming online every 30 days is necessary.
We'd like to shed some light on those, to hopefully give everyone a better understanding on the situation.
We hope the above makes it more clear why the app currently functions the way it does.
We can assure you that the privacy of all user data and how it is used is a primary directive to us and it's in no way connected to the requirement of going online. You can read more about how exactly your data is used in our Data Privacy policy.
Even with the reasons outlined, we always strive to make Spotify better and improve our users' experience. We're monitoring feedback closely and are passing it on to the right teams, so that we might find solutions to some inconveniences in the future.
Thank you for your understanding.
Interesting that Spotify has so much trouble making a good Android app. All my other apps work perfectly with offline content. The best comparative example I could use would be Netflix. I've never had to redownload offline content (or for any other app for that matter- Google Maps, Castbox, etc.)
If your developers are having issues making a usable app maybe you should consult with Netflix's developers. Their app works perfectly and it seems to me that they would have a lot of the same issues regarding content as Spotify. If they can produce a great app, Spotify should be able to as well. No excuses because it's a shame that a company would produce such an inferior product for such a great service.
And, while your at it, your development team might want to look at other podcast apps and what makes them great. The Spotify podcast part of the app lacks a lot of features that are standard with other podcast apps.
I'll look forward to coming back to Spotify once I hear your company has put a little more effort into developing the Android app.
I have had Spotify since almost the beginning of it. As of lately the this service has never been worse. It is almost unusable in offline mode these days which is a big part of the way I used to use Spotify. You would expect an app to get better over time not constantly worse. I have read the comments and the response from Spotify but think their response is so irresponsible. With the technology we have available today it is very unlikely that this problem can’t be solved. If it is a copyright issue then give us the option to pay a premium if necessary but don’t continue to publish and charge us for an app that is becoming so buggy and frustrating that it is almost useless half of the time. It used to be great back in the day when I could truly store 10,000 songs offline. The good old days are a thing of the past with Spotify. I will be trying the free month of Apple and will be switching if it is better.
I just wanted to take a few minutes to follow up on my old post here with some new information.
After spending a few years living and working in Sweden (Spotify is a Swedish company/service, for those who didn't know), I learned quite a bit about Swedish culture and lifestyle. I now have a more informed perspective, and can better understand why the Spotify apps/services are the way they are in terms of their simplicity, lack of features, lack of customization, etc.
Basically, it all comes down to a single Swedish word: "lagom"
Lagom doesn't have a very good direct translation in English. If you use Google translate, it will tell you it means "moderate". But in Swedish, lagom can have a variety of meanings depending on the context in which it is used. And in reality, it applies to so many aspects of life in Sweden that it's more of a cultural and socioeconomic philosophical concept than just being a word in their vocabulary.
In general, when used on its own, it can be taken to mean any of (including, but not limited to) the following:
In the USA, culturally, our focus tends to be on constant growth, improvement, and the relentless pursuit of progress: "bigger, better, faster, more". We have an awareness of work-life balance (work comes first), yet it tends to be much heavier on the work side of things. In Sweden, it's more of a life-work balance (life comes first), and much heavier on the side of life. A job is just a job, and doesn't define you or your value. How much you produce isn't as important as ensuring you don't work too hard or to the detriment of your physical or mental health.
To visualize how this relates to Spotify, imagine, for example, a planning meeting between the engineering and UI design teams to coordinate how the UI will look and function. In the USA, this would likely expand into several different meetings, market research, focus testing, revisions, more meetings, more focus testing, more revisions, etc. This goes on and on until, at some point, someone in authority sets a hard deadline for the UI design being completed, and both the engineers and designers (albeit somewhat begrudgingly and with some sense of disappointment) agree upon the final UI design.
In Sweden, this would probably be a single meeting to determine the basics of what is needed for the UI, the color scheme, basic functionality, etc. They might do some focus testing, but only if it's deemed necessary. Maybe there would be a follow-up meeting after the first iteration of the UI is functional to review it, and potentially decide if it needs any changes. But all in all, the whole process would be much more focused on doing as little as needed to accomplish the task at hand, as opposed to thinking of and doing everything possible to ensure that the UI design will be as aesthetically-pleasing and feature-packed as possible, while also remaining user-friendly, accessible, and fully-functional/bug-free.
This is why it is the way it is. Lagom. Only what is necessary.
As hardworking Americans, many of us might view this lifestyle concept/philosophy/business model as lazy or careless. We might think of numerous ways in which things could be expanded, improved, or fixed. And if it was up to us, these things would probably happen eventually.
But, unfortunately, it isn't up to us. And since Swedes prefer to live a carefree, relaxed life, where the workday always ends at 17:00 (or earlier, when possible - and not 5:00p.m., but 17:00, since Sweden goes by the 24-hour clock), and you don't do any more work than you need to in order to get by, or take any of your work or job stress home with you from the office, it's unlikely that anything much will expand, grow, or improve anytime soon - not unless it's lagom.
Hey there you, Yeah, you! 😁 Welcome - we're glad you joined the Spotify Community! While you here, let's have a fun game and get…